2024 Airdrop Big Revealing: Exploring Wealth-Building Opportunities and Avoiding Risk Traps
Original Author: 0x Lao Dong
2024 Airdrop Rankings
• Day 1 Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) Top: StarkNet, $19.2 billion.
• Highest Airdrop Value: Hyperliquid, $2.613 billion, averaging 28,000 U per address.
• Largest Airdrop in USD: Movement, $734.8 million airdrop.
• Most Airdrop Addresses: HMSTR, 1.29 billion TG accounts, averaging 3U.
• Top Gainer: UXLINK, 15x ATH compared to closing price on listing day.
• Top Loser: HLG, 90.66% price drop in 30 days.
Key Insights
· Emerging Narrative Tracks Rise, Traditional Hot Tracks Cool Down
The 30-day average price change of traditional hot tracks (Infrastructure, Layer2, GameFi) is -1.34%, while emerging narrative tracks like DEPIN, RWA, AI have an average increase of 41.98% over 30 days, suggesting investors should focus on emerging tracks.
· High Valuations in 2024 Projects, Market Expectations Bullish
On listing day, the FDV/raise ratio of 79 projects averages 103.9x, indicating that the overall 2024 project valuations are high, with a relatively bullish market expectation, but a potential bubble may exist.
· Frequent Early Speculative Trading, Significant Price Volatility
40% of projects hit their all-time high on the first day, while 1% hit their all-time low. This indicates that most projects face significant sell pressure early on, with many investors tending to engage in speculative trading in the initial listing period, causing potential rapid price retracements after reaching highs.
· Most Projects Show Noticeable Short-term Price Declines
62% of projects exhibit a downtrend within the first 7 days, and 65% within 30 days, with most projects showing a price decline trend shortly after Token Generation Event (TGE), and over time, both the proportion and magnitude of declines increase.
· Projects with a Larger Distribution Ratio and Fewer Lock-up Mechanisms Perform Better
Projects with a larger distribution ratio tend to be more stable and perform well, with a 30-day average increase of 16.66%. Tokens with lock-up mechanisms perform poorly, with a 30-day average decline of -43.73%.
· More Platforms Bring More Recognition
With the increasing number of exchange listings, the average project funding amount and FDV have significantly increased, indicating that market recognition and liquidity have increased, and risk tolerance has also improved
Foreword
2024 is a year of bull-bear alternation and unusually volatile in the cryptocurrency market. BTC broke through its all-time high from the year's low of $38,500, soaring to over $100,000. Meanwhile, as the market heats up, project activities have gradually become more frequent.
Compared to the 270 TGE projects in 2023, this number surged to 731 in 2024, a growth rate of 170%. Among these numerous projects, only a few are "large-cap" and "mid-cap," while the majority are still "small-cap" and "micro-cap." How have these projects performed after launch?
To answer this question, Lao Dong selected 100 relatively hot and representative projects in 2024, conducted a systematic analysis combining key data such as funding scale, price performance, distribution rules, etc., to reveal the trends and patterns of current airdrop projects. This article will speak through data to help readers understand the airdrop project situation in 2024.
Data Table
This article does not provide any investment advice but only objective data statistics and analysis
Data Analysis
I. 2024 TGE Track Analysis

The chart shows the distribution of project types in 2024. It can be seen that 2024's VC coin TGEs are mainly concentrated in traditional popular tracks such as infrastructure, GameFi, Layer2. Projects in these tracks usually require a longer development cycle, with many projects actually being developed in the past few years and only going live in 2024.
· Infrastructure projects: 19, with a 30-day average increase of 12.18%
· Layer2 Projects: 12, Average 30-Day Price Change -0.2%
· Gamefi Projects: 12, Average 30-Day Price Change 2.3%
This year, the primary emerging narrative revolves around topics such as DEPIN, RWA, AI, etc. While the overall number of TGE (Token Generation Event) projects is not high, the performance of these types of projects is quite remarkable. There may continue to be a breakout in the future.
· AI Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 24.56%
· DEPIN Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 53.56%
· RWA Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 42.17%
Traditional popular tracks are gradually cooling down, while new emerging narratives are rapidly rising. Focusing on new narrative tracks may be a more promising investment direction.
II. Funding Situation and FDV Analysis
· Out of 100 projects, 79 have disclosed their funding, with an average funding amount of $38.91 million.
There are 8 projects with funding exceeding $100 million.
· The largest proportion of projects, 44 in total, fall within the $10 million to $100 million range.
· There are 26 projects in the $2 million to $10 million range.
VC (Venture Capital) firms usually conduct rigorous due diligence on projects, reflecting the market's level of acceptance of the projects. Generally, a larger funding amount indicates a stronger confidence from investors in its future development. Through funding frequency, one can also gauge changes in track popularity and the direction of capital attention. However, funding amount alone cannot fully determine the quality of a project; a multidimensional analysis is required.
FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) is an indicator used to assess a project's potential future value. FDV is influenced by various factors before a project goes live, including funding amount, initial circulating supply, market sentiment, narrative direction, track popularity, liquidity, and trading depth, among others.
To more objectively evaluate the relationship between a project's initial valuation and actual funding, we use the FDV/Funding ratio based on the closing price of the day to divide into ranges and analyze the market performance of projects in different ranges:

· FDV/Funding Range 0-20: Reasonable or Conservative
In this range, there are a total of 21 projects with an average funding amount of $48.83 million. The data shows that 57% of the projects did not exceed the closing price on the day within 7 and 30 days. Compared to other ranges, these projects have a more stable market expectation, relatively reasonable valuation, and lower investment risk.

· FDV/Funding 20-100 Range: High Expectation
There are 33 projects in this range with an average funding amount of $51.64 million. Statistics show that 63.6% of the projects experienced price weakness within 7 days, and this percentage increased to 75.8% after 30 days. This indicates that investors had higher initial expectations for these projects, but prices experienced significant corrections in the short term, presenting a certain level of volatility risk.

· FDV/Funding 100 and above Range: High-Risk Speculation
This range contains 24 projects with an average funding amount of $12.72 million. These projects are mostly small-scale projects with no projects funded over a billion. The data shows that 70.8% of the projects experienced price weakness after 7 days, and this percentage decreased to 54.2% after 30 days. These projects are mostly concentrated in hot sectors such as infrastructure, GameFi, and LSD.
Among the 79 projects analyzed, the average FDV/Funding ratio was 103.9x, indicating that the overall valuation of 2024 projects is relatively high, and market expectations are optimistic.
III. ATH vs ATL Analysis
Analyzing ATH (All-Time High) and ATL (All-Time Low) can help us fully understand the overall performance of a project in the market and the level of investor recognition. Analyzing ATH/Today's Price and Today's Price/ATL can evaluate a project's profit potential and selling pressure risk, providing data support for assessing the project's stability in the early stages, reasonable valuation, and investment timing.
Price trends of 100 projects were analyzed, and as of today, 40% of the projects reached their ATH on the first day, while 1% of the projects hit ATL on the same day.
· Price Trend Analysis of 100 Projects: 40% of the projects reached their ATH on the first day. 1% of the projects hit ATL on the first day.

· ATH vs. Same-Day Price averages 245.22%, indicating that the same-day price has a 2.45x potential increase from the all-time high (ATH). The top-performing projects include UXLINK, WEN, DRIFT
· Same-Day Price vs. ATL averages 633.52%, meaning that the price would need to increase by 6.34x from the all-time low (ATL) to reach the same-day closing price. The worst-performing projects are SLN, FRIEND, DEFI
The market shows a strong speculative sentiment, with 40% of projects reaching their ATH on the first day. This indicates that many investors tend to engage in speculative trading early in the project's listing, which may subsequently lead to a rapid price decline.
The 245.22% ATH increase compared to the 633.52% ATL decrease highlights that the market's selling pressure risk is much higher than the project's profit potential. This data reflects that during the initial listing phase, investors are more likely to see rapid price increases driven by high market sentiment. However, this may be followed by a quick price drop due to selling pressure or factors such as token unlocks.
IV. Short-Term Project Performance Comparison
The main purpose is to analyze the short-term performance of projects. By comparing the closing price on the listing day with prices after 7 days and 30 days, we can gain a clearer understanding of the project's short-term performance and trends.

From the chart, it can be observed:
· Day 7:
62% of projects have a price lower than the closing price on the listing day, with an average decrease of 27.03%.
38% of projects have a price higher than the closing price on the listing day, with an average increase of 60.34%.
· Day 30:
65% of projects have a price lower than the closing price on the listing day, with an average decrease of 37.42%.
35% of projects have a price higher than the closing price on the listing day, with an average increase of 74.26%.
Most projects face a downward price trend shortly after their TGE, with the magnitude of the decline increasing over time.
While the majority of projects experience price drops, there are still a few projects that perform exceptionally well after their TGE, with significant price increases. Some high-quality projects can gain higher market recognition in the short term and achieve notable price growth.
Among them, ISLAND GRASS RUNESTONE performed well, while F AARK HLG performed the worst.
Possible reasons for short-term price increases:
1. Strong Fundamentals: Projects with strong technical support, clear use cases, or innovative business models can attract long-term investor attention, thereby driving price increases.
2. Narrative-Driven: Projects that capitalize on current market trends (such as GameFi, meme, DEPIN, RWA, etc.) are easily able to attract market inflows, leading to price increases.
3. Strong Community Consensus: Community consensus can increase a project's visibility and demand in the market, driving price increases. Furthermore, ongoing community support can alleviate selling pressure, enhancing the project's long-term stability.
4. Good Liquidity: Adequate liquidity helps stabilize project prices and boost investor confidence.
Possible reasons for short-term price decreases:
1. Cooling Market Sentiment: The price on the TGE day is often driven by FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) sentiment, which may be higher than the reasonable price. As the hype subsides, the price will revert to rational levels.
2. Increased Selling Pressure: After TGE, investors, especially airdrop participants or short-term investors, may choose to cash out profits, leading to increased selling pressure and price declines.
3. Token Unlocking Mechanism: Many VC coins adopt a long-term release mechanism. As tokens unlock, early investors (such as private sale participants and the team) may choose to realize profits, adding to the market's selling pressure.
4. Inadequate Liquidity: Some projects post-TGE may suffer from insufficient liquidity and limited trading depth. Once a large sell order occurs, the price can quickly drop, intensifying volatility.
5. Distribution Ratio's Impact on Price

· Projects with a **distribution ratio greater than 15%**: 15 projects, with an average 7-day price change of 11.87% and an average 30-day price change of 16.66%.
· Projects with a **distribution ratio less than 15%**: 76 projects, with an average 7-day price change of 8.31% and an average 30-day price change of 3.36%.
· Projects with a lock-up mechanism: 10 projects, with an average 7-day price change of -16.68% and an average 30-day price change of -43.73%.
The data indicates that projects with a larger distribution ratio tend to have more stable short-term performance, while projects with a strong lock-up mechanism do not perform as expected and experience larger price fluctuations.
6. Exchange Selection and Project Performance
Being listed on different exchanges or multiple exchanges can have varying impacts on the market. To better understand the overall performance of projects listed on major exchanges, Lao Dong has compiled data on several key exchanges, including the number of listings, price fluctuations, and the effect on FDV liquidity. This helps in understanding how projects on different exchanges perform and making wiser investment decisions.

· Binance: 30 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of -0.02%, 12 projects that have seen an increase (40%), a 30-day price change of -4.57%, and 12 projects that have seen an increase (40%).
· OKX: 31 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of -13.06%, 7 projects that have seen an increase (22.58%), a 30-day price change of -18.75%, and 10 projects that have seen an increase (32.26%).
· Bybit: 79 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of +2.27%, 29 projects that have seen an increase (36.7%), a 30-day price change of -4.65%, and 28 projects that have seen an increase (35.44%).
· Bitget: 74 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of +6.57%, 26 projects that have seen an increase (35.14%), a 30-day price change of +3.3%, and 28 projects that have seen an increase (37.84%).
· Coinbase: Listed 16 projects, 7-day price change -3.68%, 3 projects up (18.75%), 30-day price change +26.64%, 6 projects up (37.5%)
· Upbit: Listed 17 projects, 7-day price change -5.05%, 3 projects up (17.65%), 30-day price change +2.94%, 9 projects up (52.94%)
Based on the Number of Listings
Coinbase and Upbit have relatively fewer listings, as they tend to carefully select projects focusing more on long-term stability and compliance to avoid listing projects still in the experimental stage or high-risk.
Bybit and Bitget have more listings and are more aggressive, as these exchanges aim to attract users by frequently listing new projects to expand their market share. This strategy helps them rapidly grow in the market, attracting significant trading volume and liquidity.
Based on Short-Term Project Performance
· Bitget and Bybit have shown relatively good performance in the 7-day and 30-day periods, especially Bitget, with positive price changes in both the 7-day and 30-day periods and a high percentage of projects in the green.
· Coinbase has performed well, particularly with a +26.64% price change in the 30-day period and a higher number of projects in the green (37.5%).
· OKX and Binance have both experienced some decline in the past 30 days, especially OKX, which has seen a significant decrease of about -18.75%.
· Upbit has shown some recovery in the 30-day period with a price increase of +2.94% and 52.94% of projects in the green, indicating a good performance.

· Other Exchanges: 7 projects, average funding $6.5 million, average FDV $290 million on the same day
· Listed on 1 Exchange: 20 projects, average funding $28.86 million, average FDV on listing day $9.81 billion
· Listed on 2 Exchanges: 33 projects, average funding $20.68 million, average FDV on listing day $10.7 billion
· Listed on 3 Exchanges: 12 projects, average funding $24.57 million, average FDV on listing day $30.97 billion
· Listed on 4 Exchanges: 17 projects, average funding $31.67 million, average FDV on listing day $17.83 billion
· Listed on 5 Exchanges: 9 projects, average funding $152.15 million, average FDV on listing day $63.13 billion
· Listed on 6 Exchanges: 2 projects, average funding $95.20 million, average FDV on listing day $64.89 billion
As the number of exchanges a project is listed on increases, the average funding amount and the FDV on listing day significantly increase. This indicates high market recognition, improved liquidity, increased resilience to risk, and the ability to attract more investors.
You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk
Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:
To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:
(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.
The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.
(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.
Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.
(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.
(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.
(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.
(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.
(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.
(IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.
(X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.
(XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.
(XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.
(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.
(XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.
(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.
(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.
(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.
(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.
This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started
Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook
Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Believing in the Capital Markets - The Essence and Core Value of Cryptocurrency

Polymarket's 'Weatherman': Predict Temperature, Win Million-Dollar Payout
$15K+ Profits: The 4 AI Trading Secrets WEEX Hackathon Prelim Winners Used to Dominate Volatile Crypto Markets
How WEEX Hackathon's top AI trading strategies made $15K+ in crypto markets: 4 proven rules for ETH/BTC trading, market structure analysis, and risk management in volatile conditions.

A nearly 20% one-day plunge, how long has it been since you last saw a $60,000 Bitcoin?

Raoul Pal: I've seen every single panic, and they are never the end.

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 6th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

2026 Crypto Industry's First Snowfall

The Harsh Reality Behind the $26 Billion Crypto Liquidation: Liquidity Is Killing the Market

Why Is Gold, US Stocks, Bitcoin All Falling?

Key Market Intelligence for February 5th, how much did you miss out on?

Wintermute: By 2026, crypto had gradually become the settlement layer of the Internet economy
Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?
February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk
Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:
To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:
(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.
The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.
(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.
Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.
(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.
(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.
(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.
(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.
(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.
(IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.
(X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.
(XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.
(XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.
(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.
(XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.
(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.
(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.
(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.
(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.
This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.
Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started
Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook
Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.