a16z: The Crypto New Age, What Should the SEC Do?

By: blockbeats|2025/02/02 17:15:04
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: A new (digital) age at the SEC
Original Article Authors: Scott Walker, Bill Hinman
Original Article Translation: Luffy, Foresight News

As technology continues to evolve, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must also keep pace with the times. This is particularly evident in the cryptocurrency field. The new leadership and the newly formed cryptocurrency working group have provided the agency with an opportunity to take concrete action and make adaptive adjustments.

Now is the time for action: the cryptocurrency market has grown in size and complexity, to the extent that the SEC's previous reliance solely on enforcement while neglecting regulation is in need of an update. With professional investment services entering this emerging industry, driving market development, encouraging innovation, and protecting investors can only be achieved in this way. The principles that underpin relevant securities laws—disclosure, prevention of fraud, and maintaining market integrity—should always be sacrosanct. However, applying these principles in a manner that reflects the uniqueness of crypto assets requires targeted regulatory reform.

This article proposes immediate and actionable adjustments that the SEC should take to establish applicable regulatory rules without sacrificing support for innovation and investor protection measures. While legislation is crucial for clarifying the classification of crypto assets and regulating secondary markets, these measures will bring immediate benefits to the market.

1. Provide Explanatory Guidance on "Airdrops" and Other Incentive-Based Rewards

The SEC should provide explanatory guidance on how blockchain projects can distribute crypto assets to participants without being deemed a securities offering. These distributions are commonly known as "airdrops" or "incentives" and are typically conducted by blockchain projects for free or for a nominal fee, often as a reward for early use of a specific network or ecosystem. Such distributions are a key means for blockchain projects to build a community and achieve decentralization gradually, distributing ownership and control of the project to users.

This decentralization process has many benefits. Decentralization can protect investors from risks usually associated with securities and central control and foster network development, thereby enhancing its value. If the SEC can provide guidance on distribution matters, it can curb the trend of airdrops being conducted only for non-U.S. individuals. This trend essentially transfers ownership of blockchain technology developed in the U.S. overseas, effectively sacrificing the interests of U.S. investors and developers to create windfalls for non-U.S. individuals.

Implementation Details:

·  Establish Eligibility Criteria: Set basic standards for crypto assets that would be exempt from being deemed investment contracts (and thus securities) in airdrops and incentive-based reward distributions. For example, crypto assets whose market value is primarily derived from the programmatic running of a distributed ledger or similar technology, or from executable software deployed to a distributed ledger or similar technology, should be eligible for such distributions if they do not fall under another securities category.

2. Amend Crowdfunding Rules to Regulate Exempt Offerings

The SEC should amend crowdfunding rules to more effectively regulate exempt offerings of crypto assets.

The current limitations on fundraising scale and investor participation in crowdfunding activities are not suitable for crypto startups, as these companies often need to distribute crypto assets more widely to establish a sufficient user base and network effects for their platform, application, or protocol.

Implementation Details:

·  Raise Fundraising Limits: Increase the maximum amount that can be raised through crowdfunding to a level that matches the needs of the enterprise (e.g., based on disclosure depth, up to a maximum of $75 million or a certain percentage of the total network).

·  Exempt Offerings: Allow crypto projects to reach a broader set of investors (beyond just accredited investors) through crowdfunding platforms while relying on exemptions similar to those in Regulation D.

·  Investor Protection: Implement appropriate safeguards such as setting individual investment limits (similar to current Reg A+ practices) and establishing detailed disclosure requirements covering key information relevant to the crypto enterprise. (For example, while issuance disclosures may typically involve matters like directors, compensation, and shareholding details, disclosures around underlying blockchain, governance, and consensus mechanisms may be more critical for crypto asset investors.) Tailoring these requirements to crypto asset investors can ensure they are well-informed and protected from fraud.

These changes would enable early-stage crypto projects to access a wider investor base, promote transparency, and democratize investment opportunities.

3. Allow Broker-Dealers to Engage in Crypto Asset and Securities Business

The current regulatory environment restricts traditional broker-dealers from substantial involvement in the crypto space, primarily because it requires broker-dealers to obtain separate approvals for conducting crypto asset transactions and imposes stricter regulations on broker-dealers wishing to custody crypto assets.

These restrictions create unnecessary barriers to market participation and liquidity. Allowing broker-dealers to facilitate transactions of both security and non-security crypto assets will enhance market functionality, investor access, and investor protection. On today's crypto trading platforms, non-security crypto assets (such as Bitcoin, Ethereum) can seamlessly trade alongside crypto assets that the SEC may deem to be securities.

Specific Approach:

·  Enable Registration Mechanism: Establish a clear registration path for broker-dealers to register to engage in (and custody) crypto asset (both security and non-security) activities, with specific requirements based on the nature of these assets.

·  Enhance Regulatory Framework: Set up supervisory mechanisms to ensure compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations to uphold market integrity.

·  Collaborate with the Industry: Partner with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to issue joint guidance to address the unique operational risks of crypto assets.

This approach will help build a safer, more efficient market, allowing broker-dealers to bring their expertise in best execution, compliance, and custody to the crypto market.

4. Provide Custody and Settlement Guidance

Custody and settlement remain key barriers for institutional adoption of crypto assets. The lack of clarity in regulatory treatment and accounting rules has deterred traditional financial institutions from entering the custody market. This means many investors are unable to benefit from professional asset custody services and must instead self-custody and arrange their own custody solutions.

Specific Approach:

·  Issue Custody Guidance: Provide guidance on custody rules under the Investment Advisers Act, outlining how investment advisers can custody crypto assets, ensuring adequate safeguards like multi-signature wallets and secure offline storage. This should also include guidance on idle asset pledging and governance decision voting for crypto assets held in custody by investment advisers.

·  Establish Settlement Standards: Develop specific guidance for crypto transaction settlement, including timing, verification processes, and error resolution mechanisms.

·  Build a Technology-Agnostic Framework: Allow for the flexible adoption of innovative custody solutions that meet regulatory standards without mandating specific technological requirements.

·  Correction of Accounting Treatment: Revoke SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) to allow the accounting treatment of custodial digital assets to reflect the actual nature of the custodial arrangement rather than presuming a liability exists. Background information is that SAB 121 states, "as long as a company is responsible for safeguarding the cryptographic assets held in its custody platform... a company should recognize a liability on its balance sheet to reflect its obligation to safeguard cryptographic assets held on the platform for platform users," offset by an asset. The overall effect of SAB 121 is to include custodial cryptographic assets on the custodian's balance sheet, a practice that runs counter to the traditional accounting treatment of custodial assets. Therefore, unlike typical custodial arrangements, this accounting treatment may result in custodial cryptographic assets being included in the custodian's bankruptcy estate in the event of the custodian's insolvency. Most notably, SAB 121 lacks legality. The Government Accountability Office found that it was, in fact, a rule subject to congressional review under the Congressional Review Act, and in May 2024, a joint resolution was issued by the House and Senate disapproving of SAB 121, which was subsequently vetoed by President Biden.

This clarity will establish a foundation for institutional confidence, enabling large participants to enter the market, while enhancing market stability and competition among service providers. Additionally, both retail and institutional investors will benefit from the protections associated with professional, regulated asset management services.

5. Reform Exchange-Traded Products (ETP) Standards

The SEC should take reformative measures regarding Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) to promote financial innovation. These proposals aim to provide broader market access opportunities for investors and custodians accustomed to managing ETP portfolios.

Specific Actions:

·  Restore Market Scale Test: SEC's reliance on the "Winklevoss Test" for market surveillance protocol has delayed the approval of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency ETPs. This test requires that for commodity-based ETPs to trade on a nationally recognized exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or Nasdaq, the listing exchange must have a surveillance agreement with the "significant markets" for that commodity or its derivatives. Given that the SEC does not consider crypto exchanges as "regulated markets," this effectively means that ETPs are only viable for cryptocurrencies that have futures markets (regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission) and provide highly predictive price discovery for the underlying asset. This overlooks the significant scale and transparency of the current crypto market. More importantly, it creates an arbitrary distinction between the standards for listing applications of cryptocurrency ETPs and all other commodity-based listing applications. Therefore, we propose restoring the historical testing standard for significant market size: requiring only that the commodity futures market have sufficient liquidity and price integrity to support the ETP product. This adjustment will align the approval standards for crypto ETPs with those of other asset ETPs.

·  Enable Physical Settlement: Allow the encrypted ETP to settle directly in the underlying asset. This will bring about better fund tracking, cost reduction, price transparency improvement, and reduced reliance on derivatives.

·  Adopt Custody Standards: Strict custody standards are mandatory for physical settlement transactions to reduce theft or loss risks. Additionally, provide a pledging option for idle ETP assets.

6. Implement 15c2-11 Certification for Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) Listing

In a decentralized environment, the issuer of a cryptocurrency asset may no longer play a significant ongoing role, raising the issue of who is responsible for providing accurate disclosure information about the asset. Fortunately, there is a similar beneficial rule in the traditional securities market, the Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, which allows broker-dealers to trade a security provided that, among other conditions, investors can access the most up-to-date information about that security.

Extending this principle to the cryptocurrency market, the SEC can permit regulated cryptocurrency trading platforms (including exchanges and broker-dealers) to trade any asset that can provide investors with accurate, up-to-date information. The outcome will be increased liquidity for such assets in SEC-regulated markets, while ensuring that investors have the ability to make informed decisions. Two clear benefits of this approach are enabling the trading of digital asset pairs in SEC-regulated markets (where one asset is a security and the other is not), and discouraging the incentive for exchanges to operate overseas.

Specific Approach:

·  Simplify Certification Process: Establish a simplified 15c2-11 certification process for cryptocurrency assets listed on Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) platforms, providing mandatory disclosure about asset design, purpose, functionality, and risks.

·  Implement Due Diligence Standards: Require exchanges or ATS operators to conduct due diligence on cryptocurrency assets, including verifying issuer identity and key feature and functionality information.

·  Clarify Disclosure Requirements: Mandate regular information updates to ensure investors receive timely and accurate information. Additionally, specify when issuer reports are no longer relevant to potential buyers due to decentralization, eliminating the need for further reporting.

This framework will promote transparency and market integrity while allowing vibrant innovation in a regulated environment.

Conclusion

The SEC is at a critical moment in deciding the future regulation of crypto assets. The newly formed cryptocurrency special workgroup indicates the Commission's intention to depart from the enforcement-heavy approach of the past. By promptly taking the key steps outlined above, the SEC can begin to shift away from its previously contentious enforcement-centric posture, providing much-needed regulatory guidance and practical solutions for investors, custodians, and financial intermediaries. This will better balance investor protection with fostering capital formation and innovation.

The proposed reforms outlined above would reduce uncertainty and support financial innovation in the crypto space. Through these adjustments, the SEC can reclaim its mission, repositioning itself as a forward-looking regulatory agency ensuring the competitiveness of U.S. markets while safeguarding the public interest. The long-term future of the U.S. crypto industry may ultimately require Congress to provide a comprehensive, fit-for-purpose regulatory framework. However, until such a framework is in place, the steps outlined in this article represent a path toward appropriate regulation.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more