The Rise of AI Agents, Taking Stock of the Potential Tokens in the Virtuals Ecosystem
Original Title: ""
Original Author: KarenZ, Foresight News
With the continuous popularity of the Base ecosystem and AI delegates, and the Virtuals AI delegate token aixbt achieving over 170x growth in just half a month, surpassing a $1 billion market cap, the AI delegate protocol in the Virtuals ecosystem once again becomes the center of attention. So, among the many delegates in Virtuals AI, besides aixbt, which ones are worth special attention?
LUNA
LUNA is a virtual human delegate on the Base Virtuals protocol and also the flagship delegate of the Virtuals protocol, live 24/7. Previously, its popularity on Tiktok and the Agent narrative drove its market cap to grow rapidly to $240 million within a short period, followed by a slight retreat. In the past two days, LUNA has seen a small rebound and currently has a market cap of around $77.5 million.
SEKOIA
SEKOIA aims to create an on-chain venture capital delegate to become a fund in the Virtual ecosystem. SEKOIA's evaluation framework ensures transparency of the artificial intelligence delegate through open data and investment processes. Of course, SEKOIA is not yet fully autonomous, but its goal is to become a fully autonomous venture capital delegate. If interested, check out SEKOIA's Litepaper here. SEKOIA currently has a market cap of around $19 million.
GAME
GAME enables multiple AI delegates to operate autonomously, process inputs, generate responses, and learn from past interactions. By leveraging long-term memory (including experience, reflection, and dynamic personality traits), it enhances decision-making. GAME was released two months ago, and its market cap has surged over 180% in the last two days, currently around $18 million.
The GAME framework is built on the work done in generative agents and agent systems, which can consist of multiple building blocks and technologies such as hints, planning and reasoning, search, self-reflection and self-improvement, tool use and memory.
https://x.com/virtuals_io/status/1861437528236270025
Satoshi AI Agent (SAINT)
The Satoshi AI Agent leverages AI and deep learning to transform complex blockchain data into concise, actionable insights. The Satoshi AI Agent will launch the Full Access Terminal next month, integrating datasets from Nansen, Dune, Arkham, Coingecko, Defillama, Coinglass, Etherscan, and others all in one place. Unlocking Satoshi data will require $99/month or holding 250,000 SAINT tokens in the wallet (currently valued at $7,500). SAINT's market cap is currently around $30 million.
https://x.com/Saint_SatoshiAI
VaderAI (VADER)
VaderAI aims to be an AI agent investment DAO manager, with its Litepaper claiming to be the first autonomous trading AI agent coin, executing end-to-end trading including research and analysis, simulation and strategy, and on-chain execution. VADER's current market cap is $20 million, with a 24-hour surge of over 190%.
On November 26, VaderAI acquired a team of 3 AI engineers (who previously built Web2 AI Agent infrastructure). In addition, VaderAI also reorganized Monitize AI (which is building AI-driven tools to optimize token incentive allocation) and pivoted the entire AI team towards AI agents. The current team consists of 6 AI engineers, 1 AI researcher, 1 ML researcher, and 1 blockchain developer.
Notably, VaderAI has mentioned that it recently stopped using Virtuals' tools and is now using 100% of its own tools, with tweaks to Vader. VaderAI has integrated its API with Arkham, Etherscan, Solscan, Dune, Flipside, CoinGecko, Moralis, and X, and will soon leverage all these data sources to do more.
https://x.com/Vader_AI_
MUSIC
MUSIC is a DJ AI agent incubated by Agentstarter (Virtuals Protocol AI Agent Launchpad), launched on November 27th at Virtuals, with a current market value of $5.5 million. MUSIC leverages AI technology to autonomously create music videos, providing a dynamic entertainment experience.
In the MUSIC token, 60% of the supply is allocated for airdrops, evenly distributed to wallets that have interacted with the Base trading Virtuals agent token since launch and hold over 5 Virtuals tokens, 20% is allocated to the public liquidity pool, 10% is allocated to the Agentstarter development team, and 10% is allocated to the Virtuals Protocol for MM pools, among other uses.
https://x.com/agentstarter/status/1861689566677344529
Guanciale (GUAN)
Guanciale is an AI autonomous trading bot that identifies the best trading alpha through the Tweet Scout API. Guanciale previously stated, "Thanks to community donations, 8% of GUAN is currently held in the ecosystem fund." Guanciale has not yet launched its autonomous trading feature, and the GUAN token has a current market value of around $7.5 million.
https://x.com/GuancialeAI
WAI Combinator (WAI)
WAI Combinator is also an AI accelerator agent that will be launching its agent experience next month. WAI currently has a market value of around $1.7 million.
https://x.com/wai_combinator
You may also like

Found a "meme coin" that skyrocketed in just a few days. Any tips?

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.

Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun

Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold

Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar

Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?

Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire

Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition

From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash

