The secret to Hyperliquid's success dismantled from the five-layer financial stack
Author: Baheet
Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher
The construction of institutional-level financial infrastructure often follows a traceable path. You cannot start with the most expressive product and then work backward.
You need to start from the clearing layer, proving that it can operate normally under pressure, and then unlock all the functionalities that depend on it.
The New York Stock Exchange did not add derivatives before having a well-functioning stock market. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange did not launch options before introducing futures.
This order is by no means arbitrary. The order at the grassroots level determines the possibilities at the top level.
Hyperliquid understands this well.
The public generally views Hyperliquid as a DEX that continuously delivers products. A perpetual contract exchange that added spot, tokenized assets, and then prediction markets. A team that acts quickly.
This statement is not wrong, but it completely misses the point.
Hyperliquid did not build a DEX and then continuously add products. They built a clearing engine and unlocked it layer by layer.
Each HIP is a prerequisite, not just a feature.
And HIP-4, the proposal that everyone calls the Polymarket killer, is the ultimate proof of its clear goal from the very beginning.
Foundation
Before any HIP appeared, a design decision determined everything that followed.
Hyperliquid built HyperCore as a specific application L1 fully optimized around market microstructure. It does not pursue general programmability. It does not pursue the execution of arbitrary smart contracts.
It focuses solely on market microstructure. Sub-second confirmations, predictable execution, clear state management, and a matching engine capable of handling the throughput demands of professional derivatives trading.
This is a deliberately set constraint. By refusing to build a general-purpose chain, Hyperliquid has given up the breadth of developers that Ethereum and Solana compete for.
In return, they have a clearing engine that can reliably support institutional-level markets from day one.
This performance guarantee is something that AMM-based DEXs and general-purpose L1s have spent years trying to achieve but have not fully realized.
Every subsequent HIP has become possible because HyperCore was initially built this way.
Constraints themselves are strategic.
HIP-1: Asset Standard
The first layer is the most fundamental and the least discussed.
HIP-1 introduces Hyperliquid's native token standard, which is the protocol's response to ERC-20, but with a key structural difference.
Tokens under HIP-1 do not exist as smart contract balances on a general virtual machine. They are native units of the HyperCore engine itself, capable of being traded directly within the high-performance matching infrastructure from the moment they exist.
This distinction is far more important than it sounds.
On Ethereum, assets and the exchanges trading those assets are independent systems that must communicate across contract boundaries.
On Hyperliquid, assets and exchanges are the same system. There are no bridges, no delays introduced by cross-contract calls, and no execution risk space that plagues DeFi protocols built on general-purpose chains.
HIP-1 solves the asset availability issue.
But its deeper functionality is that it establishes HyperCore as a native home for financial primitives, not just an execution environment for arbitrary code.
Without this proof, everything that follows would be untrustworthy.
HIP-2: Guiding Liquidity
Assets without liquidity are meaningless. This is the cold start problem, which stifles far more promising protocols than any technical failure.
You need liquidity before traders appear, and you need traders before liquidity providers appear.
Most projects alleviate this contradiction through incentive programs, token release schedules, and market maker subsidies. These are not solutions. They are delays.
HIP-2 introduces Hyperliquidity, a native algorithmic market-making mechanism directly built into the protocol layer.
Unlike AMMs that passively wait for trading volume and expose liquidity providers to inevitable impermanent loss when the market settles, Hyperliquidity automates liquidity provision for spot assets in a way that makes the economic model sustainable from the first block.
Any asset launched on Hyperliquid can immediately have a fully functional market. Not "will eventually have." But immediately.
The significance of HIP-2 is not only operational. It proves that HyperCore can natively solve the cold start problem without outsourcing liquidity guidance to external market makers or incentive programs.
This proof lays the foundation for subsequent developments. Permissionless perpetual contracts will face the same cold start problem on a larger scale. HIP-2 shows that the engine is fully capable of handling it.
HIP-3: Stress Testing
It is from here that the argument becomes indisputable.
HIP-3 breaks the monopoly on listing tokens. Prior to this, every market on @HyperliquidX was deployed and managed by the core team, a centralized model that ensured quality but limited diversity.
HIP-3 introduces permissionless perpetual contracts deployed by builders, allowing external teams to deploy perpetual markets for any asset without permission.
Meme coins, indices, pre-market tokens, niche trading pairs. Anyone who can stake a million HYPE can list a market and operate within HyperCore's infrastructure.
The results were immediate. Open interest grew from less than $200 million to over $1.26 billion. Daily trading volume reached $5.9 billion.
Early participants captured up to 85% of the market share in their respective categories. By any standard, HIP-3 was an explosion.
But the most important thing HIP-3 did was not create trading volume.
It proved that creating permissionless markets on HyperCore can operate at scale under real conditions and withstand real capital risks.
The matching engine held up. The state management held up. The fee mechanism held up.
HyperCore has now passed the stress test for permissionless derivatives trading across dozens of assets simultaneously.
HIP-3 is the exam. HIP-4 is the meaning of the exam.
HIP-4: Ultimate Goal
The outcome contracts appear to be prediction market products. In reality, they are a closed loop of the entire architecture.
HIP-4 introduces fully collateralized, binary settlement contracts that trade between 0 and 1 and settle to one of those values based on verifiable event outcomes.
Without clearing, the entry point is a fixed risk exposure, settled in USDH.
On the surface, this positions Hyperliquid in direct competition with Polymarket and Kalshi. This framework is not wrong, but it underestimates the substantial transformation that is happening.
The deeper functionality of HIP-4 is that it extends HyperCore's pricing capability from assets and leverage to probabilities themselves.
Before HIP-4, HyperCore could price the value of an asset and how much leverage the market could support. After HIP-4, it can price whether something will happen.
This step completes the final piece of the financial operating system.
Price direction, leverage, and probability are the three fundamental dimensions of financial risk. HyperCore can now natively express these three dimensions in a unified margin environment on the same clearing engine.
This is why the full margin capability is the most important feature of HIP-4, not just the superficial prediction market.
Traders can use the same collateral to hold a leveraged perpetual contract position and purchase a result contract.
The idle funds at the prediction market level become active capital at the perpetual contract level.
These two systems are not adjacent products sharing a balance sheet. They are the same system expressing different dimensions of risk against the same clearing infrastructure.
No existing prediction market can offer this because no existing prediction market is built on a verified derivatives clearing engine.
Polymarket and Kalshi are the settlement layers for binary bets. HyperCore is a financial operating system that now happens to support binary bets as one of its many primitives.
Comparison
When you observe how the broader ecosystem addresses the same issues, the sequential choices made by Hyperliquid become clearer.
Most blockchain infrastructures are designed around a core belief: first give developers the maximum programmable space, and performance will follow.
This is not incorrect. Given the demands of the industry's early years, it is a rational bet.
Ethereum's programmability unlocked an entire class of financial experiments that would have been impossible otherwise. Solana's throughput demonstrated that on-chain systems can meet the speed demands of real financial applications.
Both chains have achieved genuine breakthroughs and continue to host some of the most important applications in the crypto space.
However, prioritizing programmable space over performance creates a specific technical debt.
When applications built on general-purpose chains become complex enough to require institutional-level execution, the chain must retrofit the performance guarantees it did not prioritize when laying the foundation.
This retrofitting is difficult, expensive, and can never be completely clean.
An execution environment not designed around market microstructure cannot be fully compensated for by additional Layer 2 scaling or validator optimizations.
Hyperliquid made the opposite bet. It completely restricted the design space at the foundational layer to market microstructure and then unlocked programmable space on top of a clearing engine that has already been validated under real conditions.
The cost is that early developers have a narrower exposure. The reward is that every product built on HyperCore inherits the reliability of the underlying clearing layer.
This is not a criticism of general-purpose chains. It is an observation: when financial infrastructure is designed from first principles around markets rather than programmability, what possibilities emerge.
Two different starting points, two different endpoints.
Final Thoughts
What this team is building has never been a better Binance. That kind of landscape has always been too small.
Hyperliquid is actually constructing a minimum viable tech stack for a financial operating system, assembled in the only structurally reasonable order.
Clearing first. Assets second. Liquidity third. Leverage fourth. Probability fifth.
Each layer is a proof of concept for the next layer. Each HIP is a prerequisite, not a feature.
The evidence is in this order itself.
HIP-3 did not follow HIP-2 because the team had a good idea for permissionless perpetual contracts. It followed closely because HIP-2 had already proven that HyperCore can natively solve the cold start problem.
HIP-4 did not follow HIP-3 because prediction markets are trending. It followed closely because HIP-3 had already allowed the clearing engine to undergo large-scale stress testing across dozens of assets under real capital.
This order itself is the best argument.
HyperCore can now price assets, maintain liquidity, express leverage, and settle probabilities.
This is not a list of features pieced together over time by a quick-acting team. It is an architecture with a clear goal.
The endpoint has always been HIP-4. It just requires four prerequisites to reach it.
That's all!
You may also like

WEEX Labs Lands at Dutch Blockchain Week: A Disruptive Crypto × AI Conversation Sets Sail in Amsterdam

SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.

SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?

OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.

Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI

Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention

Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.

Humanity Protocol Security Incident Escalates: More Than $31 Million Stolen From Related Addresses as Attacker Continues Selling H for ETH
On June 9, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, more than $31 million has been stolen from addresses linked to Humanity Protocol, and the attack is still ongoing, with the hacker continuously swapping H tokens for ETH. Project founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident on X, saying the issue involved a private key leak.

Bloomberg: As Bitcoin Weakens, Stablecoins and RWA Continue to Drive Expansion in Crypto Businesses
In June, Bloomberg reported that despite Bitcoin falling below $60,000 last week, wiping out about $235 billion in market value within seven days, and dropping close to 50% from last year’s peak, some core businesses in the crypto industry are still expanding, mainly in stablecoins, real-world asset tokenization (RWA), payments, and infrastructure. The report also noted that overall altcoin activity has contracted significantly: altcoin market capitalization has fallen from a peak of about $431 billion in November 2021 to around $170 billion, and among the tens of millions of tokens issued in recent years, fewer than 1,700 still maintain meaningful trading activity.

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.

Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
WEEX Labs Lands at Dutch Blockchain Week: A Disruptive Crypto × AI Conversation Sets Sail in Amsterdam
SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.
SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?
OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.
