Why Has the Cryptocurrency Market Sentiment Suddenly Become So Bearish?
Original Article Title: Why Did Crypto Sentiment Get So Bearish?
Original Author: Jack Inabinet, Bankless
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: Just four days after Bitcoin hit a new all-time high, the crypto market saw an unprecedented "10/10 Flash Crash." Not only did major coins plummet, but several altcoins went to zero, and even exchanges faced liquidation crises. Meanwhile, high-leverage yield funds like Stream Finance went bust in succession, revealing the fragile nature of the "trust me" bubble. The optimistic sentiment on social platforms quickly turned into panic, and market confidence took a heavy blow.
This article reviews the events leading up to this series of incidents and attempts to answer a key question: why did crypto market sentiment suddenly become so bearish? In the current environment of a bursting bubble and a crisis of trust, we may be at a turning point in a new cycle.
The following is the original text:
On Monday, October 6, 2025, Bitcoin hit a new all-time high, breaking through the $126,000 mark for the first time. Whether in the trenches of Crypto Twitter or between the lines of CNBC's news, hodlers were immersed in the ubiquitous "fog of hope."
Despite little change in fundamentals in the following month, just four days later on October 10, the crypto market faced a crisis—the "10/10 Flash Crash" is now seen as the largest liquidation event in crypto history.

In this catastrophic downturn, major coins plummeted by double digits, many altcoins went straight to zero, and several exchanges teetered on the brink of bankruptcy (almost all major perpetual contract platforms triggered automatic deleveraging due to inability to cover short profits).
While Trump's election as president was seen as a positive development for the crypto industry—from establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve to appointing seemingly pro-crypto regulatory officials—the price of crypto assets continued to languish.
Apart from a brief rally shortly after Trump's election in November last year, the total crypto market cap (TOTAL) has remained relatively flat compared to the S&P 500 index for nearly a year. In fact, the ratio between the two since Trump's official inauguration on January 20 has shown a staggering negative growth.

As the market continues to digest the aftermath of the 10/10 liquidation event, more and more questions are beginning to surface.
Just this past Monday, Stream Finance announced bankruptcy. This was a $200 million "trust me" style crypto yield fund that relied on leverage to provide depositors with above-market returns. Its "external fund manager" lost approximately $93 million in assets through its operations.
While details have not been disclosed, Stream is likely the first publicly known "Delta Neutral" strategy fund to blow up due to the 10/10 auto-deleveraging mechanism. Despite its structure having long been questioned, this collapse still caught many lenders off guard—they sacrificed security for higher returns without a clear risk signal.
Following Stream's collapse, panic quickly spread throughout the entire DeFi ecosystem as investors began collectively exiting similar high-risk yield strategies.

While the domino effect of Stream has not yet fully spread, this event has exposed the risk of the increasingly popular "stablecoin mining" strategy in DeFi—using deposit receipts from existing high-risk strategies to leverage up for higher returns.
Stream's self-reported losses also revealed the significant losses Delta Neutral funds could face in the 10/10 auto-deleveraging event: short hedges were forcibly unwound by the system, while spot longs were instantly liquidated.
Although the news headlines have shifted, it is certain that the losses on October 10th were catastrophic.
Whether through public DeFi operations or secretive CeFi operations, there are billions of dollars in leverage present in crypto yield funds. The question of whether the market has enough liquidity to withstand a potential wave of liquidations remains unanswered.
It is currently unclear who is "skinny dipping," but it is certain that someone in the crypto casino is already without swim trunks. If the market experiences another downturn, especially after allegations of insolvency against centralized exchanges during the 10/10 liquidation period, the concern shifts from "if something will go wrong" to "can the entire industry handle it."
You may also like

What is the connection between Huang Zheng of Pinduoduo and blockchain?

Morning Report | Prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket jointly sue Kentucky over 14.25% trading tax; Bridgewater founder discusses decision-making in the AI era: principled thinking should run parallel to AI, human insight remains irre...

If the AI bubble has already burst, who will truly remain?

Paul Graham: How to Make a Billion Dollars

After 18 years, blockchain has finally started to head towards the main channel

Claude enforces "facial recognition for household registration," starting in July, no ID card means no access?

On the day of SpaceX's IPO, the first real test of the three perpetual mechanisms

Value Distribution of Stablecoins

Galaxy Deep Dive: Is the Bitcoin Four-Year Cycle Still Valid?

SpaceX IPO, Nvidia, and Bitcoin: Why Traders Are Watching More Than Just Crypto in 2026

The other side of Musk's trillion-dollar fortune: 85% cannot be sold

The U.S. government prohibits foreigners from using Fable 5, Anthropic issues a rebuttal

Citibank releases "2030 Asset Tokenization Market Outlook": 6 major trends may create a $8.2 trillion market

The trillion-dollar valuation test: Are the three major super IPOs a celebration for tech stocks or a nightmare for the crypto market?

Morning Report | Digital Asset completes $355 million financing led by a16z Crypto; Meta completes operational separation from Manus

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash flow is the moat

Cryptocurrency market makers collectively seek change as it becomes increasingly difficult to make money



