Stablecoin remittances hit 9% in Bank of Italy test
Banca d'Italia has released a July 2026 study finding that stablecoin remittances do not consistently beat traditional transfer services on cost or speed.
Summary
- Ten USDC corridors produced total remittance costs ranging from 0.30% to nearly 9%, researchers found.
- Under 20 minutes was achievable where instant payment systems supported both fiat conversion endpoints efficiently.
- Three corridors beat Wise, while four cost more, showing stablecoin savings remained highly corridor-specific overall.
Researchers executed real transfers of 200 USDC across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and Japan.
The mystery-shopping study recorded total costs from 0.30% to almost 9%. The blockchain leg averaged only 0.4%, while exchange purchases, funding methods, withdrawals and foreign-exchange conversion produced most of the expense. The authors said stablecoins showed "no systematic cost advantage" over traditional channels.
Stablecoin remittance costs varied sharply by corridor
The Italy-to-Argentina transfer was the cheapest at 0.30%, while Argentina-to-Italy cost 8.96%. The study warned that the low outbound Argentina result partly reflected differences between the country's official and market exchange rates, rather than blockchain efficiency alone.
Brazil-to-Italy cost 2.21%, compared with 2.70% in the opposite direction. South Africa-to-Italy cost 5.44%, while Italy-to-South Africa reached 4.58%. The two UAE routes were among the most expensive at 7.20% and 8.95%, partly because card funding and withdrawal charges increased the total.
USDC beat Wise in only three comparable routes
Banca d'Italia compared its transactions with Wise simulations for the same $200 amount. USDC was cheaper in three routes: Italy to Argentina, Italy to South Africa and Brazil to Italy. It was more expensive in four, including both UAE routes and Italy to Brazil.
The researchers cautioned that the transfers and Wise simulations occurred on different dates. They also described the World Bank comparison as an indicative benchmark rather than a like-for-like test. The paper covers one stablecoin and a limited number of transactions, so its findings "cannot be readily generalized" to every provider or corridor.
Fast domestic payments determined transfer speed
The onchain portion took less than 15 minutes in seven of eight directly comparable corridors. However, complete settlement depended on the banking systems used to fund exchanges and withdraw local currency.
Transfers involving Italy's TIPS, Brazil's Pix and Argentina's Transferencias 3.0 finished in under 20 minutes. South African routes took one or two business days because standard bank transfers slowed the fiat endpoints. The study therefore found that stablecoin rails and domestic instant-payment systems worked as complements, not substitutes.
Japan presented a separate problem. The Japan-to-Italy transfer cost 1.6%, but regulatory limits required an unhosted wallet and fragmented transactions, making the process unsuitable for a direct timing comparison. The reverse route cost 1.3% without completing the final off-ramp.
Better on-ramps may matter more than cheaper blockchains
The findings support Banca d'Italia Governor Fabio Panetta's May assessment that stablecoins may work in selected corridors but do not provide a universal answer to expensive remittances. He argued that regulators should improve domestic payment infrastructure and connect fast-payment systems across borders.
A March 2026 BIS paper reached a related conclusion, identifying weak interoperability, fragmented standards and institutional differences as the main barriers to cheaper cross-border payments. That suggests blockchain settlement alone cannot remove compliance, banking and local-currency bottlenecks.
Industry deployments continue to test the other side of the argument. As crypto.news reported, Borderless.xyz found competitive stablecoin pricing across 260 business-payment corridors during the second quarter. In related coverage, a Hyundai trial moved $20,000 between the U.S. and Mexico in about seven minutes, while SBI Remit partnered with Fasset to develop stablecoin remittance infrastructure.
Those cases do not directly contradict the central-bank experiment. They involve different transfer sizes, business models and endpoints. The next step is broader testing across more tokens, providers, dates and transaction amounts, with full disclosure of exchange spreads, withdrawal costs and local payout times.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

The Drama of AI Stock Rebound: A Showdown Between a 20-Year-Old Prodigy and a 50-Year-Old Veteran

Reasons Why Domestic Financial Companies Choose Canton

The Main Players in Structural Selling Are Not Just DAT Companies|HashHub Research

Dollar: After a Month of Stability, the Market Identifies a New Risk Front for August

Election Sunday in Santiago del Estero: Gerardo Zamora Seeks to Consolidate Power Against a Fragmented Opposition

The Mirage of Efficiency: Has Artificial Intelligence Improved Recruitment?

Has Robinhood Summer Arrived? Four Experienced Players Review: Survival Rules After the Meme Frenzy

Strategy Shift from Bitcoin Focus, Multiple Securities Firms Evaluate Mizuho

Orange Alert for Severe Storms, Hail, and Gusts in the AMBA and Several Provinces

Telegram Crypto Coin: What is TON and How to Buy Toncoin

How to Pay for Telegram Premium with Crypto and Other Methods in Russia in 2026

Buying Telegram Stars with Cryptocurrency: How to Pay for Telegram Stars in Russia

Cryptocurrency Signals on Telegram: 10 Telegram Channels for Trading in 2026

How to Withdraw Crypto from a Telegram Wallet: A Step-by-Step Guide to Safe Methods

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation of Organizational Form

Cryptocurrency Arbitrage in Telegram: How Schemes, Scanners, and Real Opportunities Work

Crypto Chat in TG: 150+ Telegram Channels and Groups about Cryptocurrencies and Trading

Crypto Channels on TG: 6 Useful Telegram Channels About NFT, Blockchain, and Cryptocurrencies

How to Detect Counterfeit Dollars: Key Security Details to Verify Bills

The Euphoria for Artificial Intelligence Collides with the Reality of Its Numbers

Bitcoin Exchange in Telegram: The Best Telegram Bots for Cryptocurrency Exchange and Trading in 2026

Cryptocurrency Mining in Moscow and Several Regions of Russia to Be Banned Until 2032

Dollar Index Falls Amid Yen Intervention Concerns as Gold Prices Drop to $4,041

S&P Merval in dollars rebounded 3% in July, but country risk ended its three-month downward streak

Bitcoin Spot Trading Volume Falls to Lowest Level Since 2019, Analysts Say

Ibovespa Rises 3.5% in July: What Explains the Turnaround
![[New York Stock Market Close] Despite Warmth in AI Semiconductors, SK Hynix and SpaceX Experience Profit Taking and Weakness](/public-static/22_d448f7b258.png?format=avif)
[New York Stock Market Close] Despite Warmth in AI Semiconductors, SK Hynix and SpaceX Experience Profit Taking and Weakness

15th Anniversary: How Bitcoin Security Grew into One of the First Russian-Language Crypto Media

US Is Banning Foreign Robots—Even Roombas












